Archive for the 'Opinion' Category

A cry for Christmas cheer

There has been a long running stereotype that New Yorkers are heartless cynics. While this is, for the most part, untrue, it has recently turned out to be so, to some extent, for a specific matter — Christmas. We all know what Christmas here in the United States is like — holiday-themed songs played indefinitely, a sea of red, white, and green in stores and public areas, and of course the infamous rush of holiday shopping. This is especially true in New York, where “Christmas cheer” has become an overpowering, ever-present force in December. As such, many New Yorkers, and others throughout the country, are joining the “anti-Christmas” front in, if not anger or hatred, but just sheer annoyance, of the presence of Christmas in every nook and cranny of their life. But what is the “anti-Christmas” front. Here’s a breakdown:

The religious Protestants: These are people who want to move back to how Christmas used to be in America before the 20th Century. Little to the knowledge of the average Christmas celebrator, Christmas was not just discouraged by the early settlers in Massachusetts Bay Colony, it was hated by them. The Puritans, who saw Christmas as a religiously inaccurate (Christian and historical authroities both suggest that Jesus was born sometime in the spring) and overly pagan (the holiday was really a winter solstice holiday that incorporated Christian ideas into the Yule of Northern Europe and the Saturnalia of Rome, along with others) kept Christmas from really being celebrated in America until the late 19th and early-2th century. Lately, though, many ministers, churches, and individuals have been starting to reject Chritmas celebrations again (Beliefnet has an interesting article on the subject)

The anti-”consumerization”-of-Christmas crowd: This group is mainly made up of the disciples of Bill O’Reilly (”The War on Christmas”) and Reverend Billy/Billy Talen (What Would Jesus Buy?), who believe that Christmas has become overly-comemrcialized and needs to be be tuned down and revert back to its old ideas of family, community, giving, and the birth of Jesus.

The very religious non-Christians: Mainly very observant members of other religions, such as Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and others, are against the proliferation of Christmas in secular America, and wish for it to be restrained, in all forms, in the public sphere.

The atheists: While many “new atheists,” such as Richard Dawkins, do celebrate the secular parts of Christmas, they despise the religious parts, in contrast to those who are against the “consumerization” of Christmas.

The “annoyed” crowd: The recently emerging group of people who are ordinary, secular Americans who simply hate hearing Christmas songs at every Starbucks and seeing holiday decorations in every public space.

So, where do I fall? As a an observant Jew by American, and even New Yorker, standards, I don’t celebrate Christmas at all. No tree, no stockings, no festive, home-cooked meal on Christmas Eve and Day (though I do like to do a little more than eat Chinese food), and no childhood-belief in Santa Claus. Still, I sort of enjoy the Christmas atmosphere that exists in the United States, and especially New York City. Sure, the music gets a little annoying after a while, but I love seeing all the festive decorations, hearing some classic holiday songs, and walking through the city on a crisp, hopefully snowy, December day. But that isn’t even really about Christmas. Instead, it seems to be more about a general winter solstice celebration, the same kind that has existed throughout human society for thousand of years. Back then, people had solstice holidays so they could have some warmth and light in the cold, short days during this time of year. While we now have these basic needs on a 24/7 basis, holidays like Christmas are able to provide us with something else — a warm, hopeful spirit of giving, family, and celebration that can help us get through the darkest part of the year.

With that in mind, I wish you all a late Hanukkah Sameach (”Happy Hanukkah” in Hebrew), Happy Kwanzaa, Happy Yule, Io Saturnalia (”Happy Saturnalia” in Latin), and Merry Christmas on this winter solstice night.

Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah… Part II

200px-triumph_poster.jpgYou may remember my last post with this title, taken from Kaddish,the Jewish prayer for the dead. It was for when The New York Giants lost their first playoffs game of the season, hence cutting them short of another chance at the Super Bowl.

Well today marks another, even more sad occasion — Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. has bought Dow Jones, including The Wall Street Journal. Yes, at some point early this morning or last night, following months of deals, talks and deliberation, News Corp. and Dow Jones signed the deal for the sale of one of the oldest and most prestigious news organizations in the world. Now, as I already went over what this deal means for the future of Dow Jones and the newspaper industry in general in an older post which came out when Murdoch first proposed the sale, I will simply restate my central point:

News Corp. offers the [newspaper] industry exactly what it wants — money, popularity, and regained dominance. Of course, News Corp. would do to the entire newspaper industry what it did to The Times of London, The News York Post, and countless others — turn it into a platform for Murdoch’s (and, as it’s assumed, his successor’s) conservative political ideas and resorting the journalistic quality to that of the cheapest tabloids.

In a nutshell, this means that Murdoch knows how to make a 19th century business profitable in the 21th century, albeit at the price of all and any journalistic integrity. Even more simply, he can “save the newspaper industry by taking its soul.” Yeah, you get the point.

So, the paperwork has been signed. The Bancroft family, after much fighting, debating, and dealing, finally agreed to the deal, ending their 100 years of ownership of Dow Jones. Of course, as many journalist, analysts, and others, including, deep down, myself, believed, the sale of Dow Jones to News Corp. was a done deal the day CNBC broke the story.

So, while News Corp. will engulf Dow Jones and The Wall Street Journal, breaking down its esteemed journalism into little, bite-sized articles of trash, the story of Dow Jones’s final days will not entirely be a sad one. The Bancroft family, despite eventually giving in to Murdoch’s requests, fought very nobly for the integrity of their publication, and I still hold a great deal of respect for those who kept on fighting until the end, including Christopher Bancroft and Jane Cox MacElree. Speaking of fighting until the end, Leslie Hill has now become, in my mind, one of the most noble business people I know. Not only does Ms. Hill refuse to be in the same room as Murdoch, she also resigned from the Dow Jones board right after the sale was finalized. You go girl!

But, no matter how well they fought, Dow Jones has in fact loss. So now, let us say a virtual prayer for what such a great, bold, and strong news company: Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah…

How News Corp. will save the newspaper industry by taking its soul

ff_142_murdoch1_f.jpgThe year is 2015. Every day, millions of Americans wake up, get dressed, and go to work. Each day they also carry in hand a newspaper, whether from a subscription or a newsstand. The paper is digital, with automatic, real-time updates from the Internet, complete with streaming text, video, and images. The newspapers experience newfound prosperity that hasn’t existed since the 1940s. Advertisers and readers flock to them, paying for subscriptions and reading in print and online, in perfect harmony. But the newspapers also are no longer what they were like even just ten years ago. Everything that’s published goes through careful screening. All articles considered to be too far left of the industry’s conservative agenda are edited or all together cut. While not always very obvious, everything in the paper is at least subtly leaning towards the political right. The newspaper content has been reduced to that of tabloid quality, with mostly celebrity gossip and very little actual news. While there are no official ties, the government and the newspapers have an agreement — keep information filtered, and everyone’s happy. Well, everyone except the rebels…

This future isn’t fiction. It’s not some 3rd-rate sci-fi novel. It could be real. Well, maybe not exactly. Sure, I may have went a little too far with the whole totalitarian-government-media-ties thing — and the rebels — but, the idea of a conservative-leaning, no-longer-totally-free press may not be too far off. Why? Well because today, News Corp. offered to buy Dow Jones. Why is this such bad news? Well, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., the same people who gave the world the journalistic gems of Fox News and The New York Post (which, back in the day, used the be an excellent paper), has now placed a bid to buy a company that provides the newspaper that just about every single businessman (and woman) in the world, and more, reads. Fortunately, the Bancroft family, which owns more than half of Dow Jones, rejected the deal. But this scary prospect could eventually become reality. News Corp. had attempted to buy Dow Jones before, and after failing again, they may turn onto other targets. Who’s to stop them from buying The Chicago Sun-Times, The Washington Post, or even (God forbid) The New York Times? One would expect the newspaper companies, but the scariest thing is, they may not.

You see, the newspaper industry is not doing very well right now. It’s losing a lot of market share to blogs, podcasts, and the Web in general (and of course, the even more ever-present TV doesn’t help either). With the ability to get free news online, even from the newspapers’ own sites, why would you pay for a subscription, which not only helps keep the newspaper alive, but also attracts the vital revenue source of advertisers? That’s the problem that newspapers today are facing. Most of the major papers like the Times still haven’t yet figured out to solve this major issue, and while The Wall Street Journal gets by by making nothing free online (because it can be deducted from most businessman’s taxes, and possibly even offered for free by the business itself), the industry itself is really falling behind. But, there is one company that knows how to save the newspaper industry. Unfortunately, this one company is News Corp.

The thing is, News Corp. really knows how to handle itself in a wired world. It already owns the social center of the Web, MySpace, and has assets in just about every form of free expression, including books, newspapers, magazines, TV, and movies. With the potential to bring together old and new media into profitable harmony (for more on Murdoch, News Corp., and the web, see this Wired article), News Corp. could control the entire media landscape itself, if the newspapers let it. And why wouldn’t they? News Corp. offers the industry exactly what it wants — money, popularity, and regained dominance. Of course, News Corp. would do to the entire newspaper industry what it did to The Times of London, The News York Post, and countless others — turn it into a platform for Murdoch’s (and, as it’s assumed, his successor’s) conservative political ideas and resorting the journalistic quality to that of the cheapest tabloids.

So, in the end, what it comes down to is whether the major newspapers will sell their soul to Murdoch and News Corp. for money and power. But for now, Dow Jones turned down the offer and Murdoch still has only one U.S. paper. Still, be wary of what News Corp.’s next move may be, which could be sooner than you think.