Archive for the 'In the News' Category

“This thing of ours, it’s over”

Sopranosposters2How does one mourn the death of a loved one? The Egyptians held elaborate burial processions filled with wailing mourners when a Pharaoh died. Jewish and Catholic families of the deceased stay inside while friends and family make solemn visits. But tonight, when one of America’s most dearly beloved prepares to enter the pearly gates up high, most people will just be glued to their television screens. Why? Because tonight, the season finale and last episode — ever — of HBO’s The Sopranos will air.

The Sopranos has been regarded by many people as the best show on television ever. But, after eight years and six seasons, America’s favorite “family ” (OK, maybe the Kennedys or Corleones are more popular) is going off the air. To most non-Sopranos fans, this isn’t that big a deal. But, for those who have been following the fictional North Jersey-mob since the beginning (or at least since the beginning of this season — like me), this is a huge event. But what makes The Sopranos so amazing? Really, it’s the writing. David Chase, the renowned producer of the series, is able to mix vivid dialogue, realistic scenarios, and complex characters together to create one heck of a show. But it isn’t all the writing — the acting is also amazing. James Gandolfini, who plays the infamous Tony Soprano, is able to go incredibly deep into the mind of a part-psychopath mobster and part-family man. Edie Falco (Carmela Soprano), Michael Imerioli (Christopher Moltisanti), Lorraine Bracco (Dr. Jennifer Melfi), and more form a very well-rounded out and phenomenal cast, bringing the show to life with vivid realism.

But, despite how amazing the show is, the thing that most Sopranos fans have been talking about for the past week is not the quality of the series but “who’s gonna get whacked?” With a variety of theories floating around, from Tony killing Carmela to Phil killing Tony to Paulie killing everyone, the possibilities are endless. But, because this is my blog and I make the editorial decisions around here, here’s my personal theory on how the show will end (note, non-Sopranos fans may not understand half of what I say here):

Paulie’s going to try to whack Tony. He’s the only big guy left, and he’s always had a nasty temper. In the mean time, AJ’s going to get wind of a plot to kill Tony by Phil Leotardo’s crew, and try to come to his dad’s rescue. While AJ makes his way over to Tony’s hiding place, Paulie’s got the boss cornered with a loaded pistol, and is not afraid to use it. Now, just as Paulie pulls the trigger, AJ jumps in and takes the bullet. With Paulie and Tony both in shock, Phil’s guys bust in and kill Paulie while Tony manages to make it out alive. Carmela soon gets wind of what happens, and in a final cry of frustration of her husband’s profession the death of her only son, divorces Tony and cuts off all ties with him, once and for all. Meadow also follows in her mother’s example, leaving Tony alone. At the same time, the FBI busts Phil’s operation, leaving Tony in the clear. But, with his family in ruins and his personal life destroyed, Tony has to live out his days in poverty and solitude — the classic Greek tragic ending.

Well, that’s my two cents. But for now, it’s only speculation and mourning. So, goodbye my beloved Sopranos, too bad I only knew ya for 14 months. But hey, the magic of Netflix is that I can see all previous five seasons, plus start watching HBO’s other critically acclaimed show, The Wire. But, in the immortal words of Carmela Soprano, “Everything must come to an end.”

40th Anniversary of the Six Day War

Soldiers Western Wall 1967Today marks the 40th anniversary of the Six Day War (during which Israel captured the West Bank with East Jerusalem, the Sinai peninsula with the Gaza Strip, and the Golan Heights) on the Gregorian calendar (the day is celebrated in Israel as Yom Yerushalayim on the Hebrew calendar date of Iyar 28, which occurred a few weeks ago). Unfortunately, I did not have enough time to write a full post about the anniversary, but I did find a great op-ed in The Times that summed up my opinion on the war and its aftermath. The general gist of the piece, by Israeli Tom Segev, is as follows:

But peace with the Palestinians has not come one inch closer. As a result more and more Israelis realize today that Israel gained absolutely nothing from the conquest of the Palestinian territories. Speculating again in hindsight — Israel may have been better off giving up the West Bank and East Jerusalem without peace than signing the 1994 peace agreement with Jordan while keeping these territories. Forty years of oppression and Palestinian terrorism, both extremely cruel, have undermined Israel’s Jewish and democratic foundations. With about 400,000 Israelis living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank and with extreme Islamism as a driving force among the Palestinians, the conflict has become infinitely more difficult to solve.

This is pretty much the same as my views, which is that the settler movement, the movement of right-wing Israelis to Palestinian territories, is the cause of most of Israel’s problems and its negative image with the liberal populous and world in general.

Obviously, I have a tremendous amount of affinity for and pride in Israel. But, unfortunately, most of the world doesn’t feel that way. The settler movement has caused Israelis to become deeply trenched in the Palestinian territories, resulting in the peace process become infinitely harder and more complicated. Plus, this difficulty in achieving peace has caused Israel to become regarded by most of the world as “having a negative influence in the world” at best, and “should be wiped off the map” at worst. What conservative Israelis, and even their global opponents, forget is that Israeli was founded on the principle of compromise. The partition of Palestine gave Israel very little territory, yet David Ben-Gurion still accepted it. So, while Israel may have made some dumb decisions in its past, that doesn’t mean that it has no right to exist.

Larry Wilmore, a.k.a. The Daily Show’s “Senior Black Correspondent” on Fresh Air

Wilmore200On today’s edition of NPR’s Fresh Air (which also publishes a podcast on iTunes), Larry Wilmore, who is The Daily Show’s “Senior Black Correspondent,” in addition to creating The Bernie Mac Show, writing for The Fresh Prince of Bel Air, and guest producing on The Office (and appearing in one episode as a “diversity coach”) is interviewed by Terry Gross. It’s a really interesting interview with discussions on blacks in television and other topics, in addition to hearing something serious from a really funny Daily Show correspondent.

Steve Jobs: “Like giving ice water to someone in hell

Steve Jobs, you bloody genius.

How News Corp. will save the newspaper industry by taking its soul

ff_142_murdoch1_f.jpgThe year is 2015. Every day, millions of Americans wake up, get dressed, and go to work. Each day they also carry in hand a newspaper, whether from a subscription or a newsstand. The paper is digital, with automatic, real-time updates from the Internet, complete with streaming text, video, and images. The newspapers experience newfound prosperity that hasn’t existed since the 1940s. Advertisers and readers flock to them, paying for subscriptions and reading in print and online, in perfect harmony. But the newspapers also are no longer what they were like even just ten years ago. Everything that’s published goes through careful screening. All articles considered to be too far left of the industry’s conservative agenda are edited or all together cut. While not always very obvious, everything in the paper is at least subtly leaning towards the political right. The newspaper content has been reduced to that of tabloid quality, with mostly celebrity gossip and very little actual news. While there are no official ties, the government and the newspapers have an agreement — keep information filtered, and everyone’s happy. Well, everyone except the rebels…

This future isn’t fiction. It’s not some 3rd-rate sci-fi novel. It could be real. Well, maybe not exactly. Sure, I may have went a little too far with the whole totalitarian-government-media-ties thing — and the rebels — but, the idea of a conservative-leaning, no-longer-totally-free press may not be too far off. Why? Well because today, News Corp. offered to buy Dow Jones. Why is this such bad news? Well, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., the same people who gave the world the journalistic gems of Fox News and The New York Post (which, back in the day, used the be an excellent paper), has now placed a bid to buy a company that provides the newspaper that just about every single businessman (and woman) in the world, and more, reads. Fortunately, the Bancroft family, which owns more than half of Dow Jones, rejected the deal. But this scary prospect could eventually become reality. News Corp. had attempted to buy Dow Jones before, and after failing again, they may turn onto other targets. Who’s to stop them from buying The Chicago Sun-Times, The Washington Post, or even (God forbid) The New York Times? One would expect the newspaper companies, but the scariest thing is, they may not.

You see, the newspaper industry is not doing very well right now. It’s losing a lot of market share to blogs, podcasts, and the Web in general (and of course, the even more ever-present TV doesn’t help either). With the ability to get free news online, even from the newspapers’ own sites, why would you pay for a subscription, which not only helps keep the newspaper alive, but also attracts the vital revenue source of advertisers? That’s the problem that newspapers today are facing. Most of the major papers like the Times still haven’t yet figured out to solve this major issue, and while The Wall Street Journal gets by by making nothing free online (because it can be deducted from most businessman’s taxes, and possibly even offered for free by the business itself), the industry itself is really falling behind. But, there is one company that knows how to save the newspaper industry. Unfortunately, this one company is News Corp.

The thing is, News Corp. really knows how to handle itself in a wired world. It already owns the social center of the Web, MySpace, and has assets in just about every form of free expression, including books, newspapers, magazines, TV, and movies. With the potential to bring together old and new media into profitable harmony (for more on Murdoch, News Corp., and the web, see this Wired article), News Corp. could control the entire media landscape itself, if the newspapers let it. And why wouldn’t they? News Corp. offers the industry exactly what it wants — money, popularity, and regained dominance. Of course, News Corp. would do to the entire newspaper industry what it did to The Times of London, The News York Post, and countless others — turn it into a platform for Murdoch’s (and, as it’s assumed, his successor’s) conservative political ideas and resorting the journalistic quality to that of the cheapest tabloids.

So, in the end, what it comes down to is whether the major newspapers will sell their soul to Murdoch and News Corp. for money and power. But for now, Dow Jones turned down the offer and Murdoch still has only one U.S. paper. Still, be wary of what News Corp.’s next move may be, which could be sooner than you think.

Apple announces Q2 earnings and stock surges above $100

appleq2financials.jpgIn contrast to my previous post, here’s a positive post about financial news: Apple Inc., better known to, well, everyone, as Apple, has announced its Q2 earnings this afternoon, and they’re pretty amazing at $0.87 EPS, which is up from $0.47 EPS in the year-ago-quarter, and $5.26 billion and $770 million in quarterly revenue and net profit, respectively. Apple has also sold 36% more Macs and 24% more iPods since last year. Plus, the Q2 earnings beat the $0.64 EPS analyst expectation by $0.23. What this means: Apple’s still growing and thriving, and its stock price has surged, going up $7.10 (7.45%) in after-hours trading at the time of publishing, all the way to an all-time-high (not including previous highs today in after-hours trading) of $102.45. So, whether you’re an Apple fan, shareholder, or both (like me), this’ll be good news to you’re ears.

Note: Apple has also announced that it’s not going to fight with ex-CFO Fred Anderson (who accused Steve Jobs of being responsible for the stock options scandal).

Note 2: From TUAW: “During this afternoon’s financial conference call, Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer announced that a third Big Apple store is being planned. It’s been suggested that this building at 401 West 14th Street will be the third store’s location. At 52,000 square-feet, it would house one heck of a store.” And yes Dave, as you pointed out in your post, New Yorkers do get everything. Except free municipal Wi-Fi. And driving distance from Apple, Google, digg, Macworld and more headquarters. Damn you San Francisco!

Boris Yeltsin dies

24yelstin-190-2.jpgThe New York Times:

Boris N. Yeltsin, the burly provincial politician who became a Soviet-era reformer and later a towering figure of his time as the first freely elected leader of Russia, presiding over the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the demise of the Communist Party, died yesterday in Moscow. He was 76.

Yes, Boris Yeltsin, Gorbachev’s successor is now dead. So, what’s the big deal? Well, like Gorbachev, Yeltsin was an economic reformer. Of course, he was also a drunk and chaotic leader. Still, he was better than the current Russian president, Vladimir Putin, who’s reversing all of the economic and political progress that Gorbachev and Yeltsin made. By recreating the fear of the Cold War-era Soviet Union and causing the entire country to rely on petroleum for money, Putin’s slowly been bringing Russia back to its dark ages. The death of Yeltsin, who tried to do everything that Putin didn’t do, is a symbol of this tragedy.

So long (Imus) and thanks for all the fish

It was inevitable.

The New York Times:

CBS brought the tumultuous weeklong crisis over racially insensitive remarks by the radio host Don Imus to an end late this afternoon when it canceled the “Imus in the Morning” program, effective immediately

Imus has always been, well, controversial. His comments frequently are borderline racist, anti-semitic, and sexist. Still, he usually manages not to cross that very, very dangerous border. But he screwed up, and possibly permanently damaged his career. Imus had made racist comments before, but none got as much attention as this. Why? Maybe because his comments were directed to a team of young, female athletes who managed to get to the most important game in their season. Or maybe this was finally the breaking point. But, whatever the reason, Imus is gone. In fact, this whole chain of events reminds me of a traditional Passover song, Dayenu (It would have sufficed)…

If Media Matters had written the article about Imus’s comment, but other newspapers had not picked it up — Dayenu (It would have sufficed)!
(Chorus: Day, day, enu! Day, day, enu! Day, day, enu! Dayenu, Dayenu, Dayenu! Day, day, enu! Day, day, enu! Day, day, enu! Dayenu, Dayenu, Dayenu!)

If the other newspapers had picked it up, but NBC and CBS had not condemned Imus’s remarks — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If NBC and CBS had condemned Imus’s remarks, but Imus had not apologized — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If Imus had apologized, but various organizations had not called for Imus to be fired — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If various organizations had called for Imus to be fired, but Imus had not appeared on Al Sharpton’s radio show — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If Imus had appeared on Al Sharpton’s radio show, but CBS and NBC hadn’t suspended him for two weeks — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If CBS and NBC had suspended Imus for two weeks, but if he had not met with the Rutgers women’s basketball team — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If Imus had met with the Rutgers women’s basketball team, but if Proctor and Gamble had not dropped all of its ads from MSNBC’s daytime programming (and other advertisers dropping ads from Imus’s show) — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If Proctor and Gamble had dropped all of its ads from MSNBC’s daytime programming (and other advertisers dropping ads from Imus’s show), but MSNBC had not dropped Imus’s show — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

If MSNBC had dropped Imus’s show, but CBS had not dropped it — Dayenu!
(Chorus)

But all jokes aside, I am very ashamed at Imus for making such racist comments. And as for him loosing his show, I’m sure XM or Sirius (or their new combined company, if they do ever merge), will be happy to pick up Imus, even if he’s not in the star lineup.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

…as if millions of Mac users cried out, and were then silenced

No, no, NO!!!!!!

Macworld:

Apple on Thursday released a statement noting that Mac OS X v10.5 “Leopard” won’t be released until October. The cause of the delay? The iPhone.

And the irony of it all is that the iPhone could be one of Apple’s greatest blunders (putting so much money into such an expensive phone), and Leopard one of its great success (ultimate integration between Windows and OS X).

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Bush almost goes kaboom!

The Detroit News:

Credit Ford Motor Co. CEO Alan Mulally with saving the leader of the free world from self-immolation.

While it may have been soothing to see President Bush blow up in flames, the though of Cheney getting total and absolute power (which, in reality, he already has) is pretty damn scary.

[via digg]

Technorati Tags: , , , ,