Archive for the 'In the News' Category

Palestinian-Israeli-American peace talks redux

As many of you already know, today was the Middle East Peace conference in Annapolis, Maryland, hosted by President Bush. While many other Middle Eastern dignitaries showed up, the main attractions were Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who were there to, at least in theory, try to discuss peace between their waring peoples. If anything, the greatest accomplishment for Bush from the event was the following photograph (which is most graciously stolen from The New York Times).
27Prexy2-600
Nice, isn’t it? But doesn’t it remind you of another, similar photograph from, say, 1993?
Rabin, Clinton, Arafat
Yeah, that picture depicts then-Isralei Prime minister Yitzchak Rabin, PLO leader Yassir Arafat, and President Clinton at the signing of the Oslo Accords. Now, let’s see what they’re up to now:
Rabin, Clinton, Arafat-1
Yeah, not so good. And as for the Oslo Accords, they kind of, well, failed. The Israeli and Palestinian death toll from suicide bombings and attacks over the past fourteen years should tell you that. But that was then, what about now? Here’s how our current peace-makers are doing in the polls:
27Prexy2-600-1
OK fine, “Hamas wants to kill me” isn’t a percentage, but I couldn’t find any Abbas poll statistics in a quick Google search. And as for Olmert’s numbers, they’re the same as the margin of error, or lower! Theoretically, less than zero people in Israel support Olmert! That’s not even possible!!! But the point is that all of these guys need something good on their record if they want to go down in history as anything better than “total screw-up.”

Sure, maybe I’m taking a cynical view on the conference, which I am. But truthfully, Israel-Palestine talks haven’t worked well in the past. Rabin was assasinated for even participating in them! But I still believe that peace is possible, just not in Annapolis with a President who needs something to distract the public from Iraq. But on the plus side, Abbas and Olmert have both vowed to come up with a peace treaty by the end of the year. For their sake, and ours too, hopefully they will.

“A date which will live in infamy”

911 World Trade CenterOn the morning of December 7th, 1941, an air strike from the Empire of Japan attacked the U.S. military base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. A day later, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan, thus entering the U.S. into World War II. In the almost 66 years that have gone by since this event, many, especially of my generation, have lost the emotion attached to it. But this has been replaced by an even greater modern catastrophe — the September 11th attacks.
Now, the reason I evoke the attack on Pearl Harbor on this sixth anniversary on 9/11 is because of how much Pearl Harbor changed the world today. Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into World War II on the side of Allies, which if we had not done, the Axis would have probably won the war, thus changing the course of world history forever. But could 9/11 have had this same effect?

Right now it’s too soon to tell. But just six years later, so much has already changed. When millions of ordinary Americans went to bed on September 11th, 2001, not one of them could possibly have imagined how different life would be like today. The 90’s in the United States, and much of the world, was a heyday. Not since the 1920’s had the U.S. had both economic prosperity and diplomatic peace on such a scale (and not to mention being loved by, or at least popular with, much of the world). Alas, it was not to be for long. First, with the dotcom bust of 2000, and then with 9/11 a whole generation of baby boomers entered a new era defined by an unpopular war, an unpopular president, and the always looming threat of terror in an unbalanced and disrupted world. And adults aren’t the only ones affected. My generation, also known as Generation Z (or what I like to call “the iGeneration” — those born in the early and mid-1990’s) is following a similar pattern to those born in the early-to-mid-1920’s — prosperity during the single-digit years, a catastrophe, and the difficult aftermath during the teenage and young adult years.

Still, as I said before, we’re only just beginning to get some perspective on the events of 9/11. We still don’t know how the war in Iraq and the overall war on terror will proceed. We still don’t know how much of the current geo-political make-up was caused by 9/11. But, what is for sure,is that life will never exactly be the same after the “date which will live in infamy.”

* * *

While the main part of my post is now finished, I just wanted to make one final note. Today is not just to commemorate those who died (for a complete list, see here), but also for those who have survived. Here in New York City is probably the place where people are the most affected by the tragic events of 9/11, especially since many people know first-hand someone who died because of the attacks. Yet many people who were at the World Trade Center that day and in the days after got sick from rescue work, yet still don’t recieve government-susidized heathcare. To help, try writing to your local copngressman about the problem (sorry I don’t have a link for a website on the matter).

But even though this September 11th (a Tuesday, just like in 2001) was a dark and gloomy day here in New York, the sun setting leaves a nice, cool blue of solemmn, calm rememberence on the whole city skyline.

Props to the Pops: “On Education” column on digg!

Somehow, my dad, who is, in every possible way, “technologically inept,” managed to get on the front page of super-modern-Web-2.0 social news site digg (His story, from his most recent education column about a teacher who was forced to pass a failing student, has 2041 diggs and counting). Yet somehow, me, with all of the tech blogging and podcasting I do, never once got any of my work on digg. So why is is that my father did. Could it be his 30+ years of journalistic experience, the recognition of his publisher, or just the fact that he’s an amazing writer? Nah, I don’t think so.

But seriously, the column was very well written, in addition to the fact that I actually read it (I admittedly do not read most of my father’s many columns). So, you guys should definitely check out the column, and digg it up! Now, if only it could get on Diggnation

Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah… Part II

200px-triumph_poster.jpgYou may remember my last post with this title, taken from Kaddish,the Jewish prayer for the dead. It was for when The New York Giants lost their first playoffs game of the season, hence cutting them short of another chance at the Super Bowl.

Well today marks another, even more sad occasion — Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. has bought Dow Jones, including The Wall Street Journal. Yes, at some point early this morning or last night, following months of deals, talks and deliberation, News Corp. and Dow Jones signed the deal for the sale of one of the oldest and most prestigious news organizations in the world. Now, as I already went over what this deal means for the future of Dow Jones and the newspaper industry in general in an older post which came out when Murdoch first proposed the sale, I will simply restate my central point:

News Corp. offers the [newspaper] industry exactly what it wants — money, popularity, and regained dominance. Of course, News Corp. would do to the entire newspaper industry what it did to The Times of London, The News York Post, and countless others — turn it into a platform for Murdoch’s (and, as it’s assumed, his successor’s) conservative political ideas and resorting the journalistic quality to that of the cheapest tabloids.

In a nutshell, this means that Murdoch knows how to make a 19th century business profitable in the 21th century, albeit at the price of all and any journalistic integrity. Even more simply, he can “save the newspaper industry by taking its soul.” Yeah, you get the point.

So, the paperwork has been signed. The Bancroft family, after much fighting, debating, and dealing, finally agreed to the deal, ending their 100 years of ownership of Dow Jones. Of course, as many journalist, analysts, and others, including, deep down, myself, believed, the sale of Dow Jones to News Corp. was a done deal the day CNBC broke the story.

So, while News Corp. will engulf Dow Jones and The Wall Street Journal, breaking down its esteemed journalism into little, bite-sized articles of trash, the story of Dow Jones’s final days will not entirely be a sad one. The Bancroft family, despite eventually giving in to Murdoch’s requests, fought very nobly for the integrity of their publication, and I still hold a great deal of respect for those who kept on fighting until the end, including Christopher Bancroft and Jane Cox MacElree. Speaking of fighting until the end, Leslie Hill has now become, in my mind, one of the most noble business people I know. Not only does Ms. Hill refuse to be in the same room as Murdoch, she also resigned from the Dow Jones board right after the sale was finalized. You go girl!

But, no matter how well they fought, Dow Jones has in fact loss. So now, let us say a virtual prayer for what such a great, bold, and strong news company: Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah…

My iDay coverage

After a nice weekend at the beach to clear my mind of all things Mac, I’m back now and face a tsunami of iPhone news stories and blog posts — joy. But on the plus side, some of those are mine. As I posted before, I was at the 5th Avenue Apple Store in New York on Friday to cover the iPhone launch for The Teen Tech Buzz podcast and Macworld. While The Teen Tech Buzz coverage hasn’t been posted yet, the Macworld stuff has, in three forms. The first is a written report of coverage from around the country of the iPhone launch. I have a few paragraphs in the New York section, with a byline, of course, and a photo right next to it. That photo, plus another that I did and several from other Macworld correspondents, is posted on a gallery on Macworld’s iPhone Central blog. Finally, some of my audio coverage is on episode #87 of the Macworld Podcast.

So, while not all of my coverage is online, all of it will be soon, in the form of Flickr photos, a special part of The Teen Tech Buzz podcast, and a set of MacUser/iPhone Central posts. So, to all you security guards, line-waiters, and Apple Store employees who doubted my press credentials — look who’s laughing now.

Sopranos Finale Theories Roundout

SPOILER ALERT: DETAILS OF THE SOPRANOS FINALE FOLLOW

With the controversy and puzzlement surrounding the final episode of HBO’s The Sopranos, many people have come up with various theories on the matter. Here’s a short showcase of some:

Comment #55 on a Gothamist post says:

Tony dies. Its all about looking at the earlier episodes in the series. The guy at the bar is Nick Leotardo, Phils brother or cousin. He was in one of the earlier episodes. The black guys who walk in are the guys who tried to kill tony but shot him in the ear in an earlier episode. Then if you notice tony walks into the diner and looks at the booth then the view changes to his perspective. As everyone walks in theres chimes. Carmella walks in and theres chimes, A.J. walks in and chimes, medow walks in and no chimes and it goes black. But rememer when tony and bobby are talking about what it feels like when someone gets “wacked” They say its like you dont even feel it everything probably just goes black. And thats what happened everything went black. So tony dies.

Alia Malek, one of my dad’s former students, said this:

in medieval times, staging of plays ended with different curtains. a white curtain meant death ie protagonist had died. i imagine hamlet would end with a white curtain for examle. a star-y curtain means better things, ie romance etc.

when the black curtain was dropped or “cut to black” (which is where expression comes from) audience is being signalled to “use your imagination” — and if you noticed, sopranos did not fade to black, but cut to black.

it’s so brilliant i’m getting goosebumps thinking about it… i love that ending, though i really hope the whole family is not about to get killed at the diner.

But, my personal favorite is Stephen Colbert’s ideal ending:

That Sopranos finale was such a rip-off. Here’s how it should have ended. Big mob shootout, Tony gets it in the Adam’s apple, he’s losing consciousness, then the screen does that dissolve-y, wipe-y thing, and boom, he’s in bed, waking up from a nightmare. “Wow honey, I just dreamed I spent the last eight years as a mobster in northern New Jersey.” And here’s the kicker — his wife, Carrie Bradshaw. The whole series was a Sex and the City spin-off.

I think that the second theory is most accurate, with that whole Nick Leotardo thing being just an urban legend. Personally, I follow the ideas presented in an article I still have not yet been able to find again, which said that with the camera acting like Tony’s eyes, normal people in a normal restaurant seem like hitmen, showing that Tony will spend the rest of his life looking over his shoulder.

Don’t like any of these theories? Well, go watch the finale and come up with your own. Or, just see the crucial restaurant scene below:

“This thing of ours, it’s over”

Sopranosposters2How does one mourn the death of a loved one? The Egyptians held elaborate burial processions filled with wailing mourners when a Pharaoh died. Jewish and Catholic families of the deceased stay inside while friends and family make solemn visits. But tonight, when one of America’s most dearly beloved prepares to enter the pearly gates up high, most people will just be glued to their television screens. Why? Because tonight, the season finale and last episode — ever — of HBO’s The Sopranos will air.

The Sopranos has been regarded by many people as the best show on television ever. But, after eight years and six seasons, America’s favorite “family ” (OK, maybe the Kennedys or Corleones are more popular) is going off the air. To most non-Sopranos fans, this isn’t that big a deal. But, for those who have been following the fictional North Jersey-mob since the beginning (or at least since the beginning of this season — like me), this is a huge event. But what makes The Sopranos so amazing? Really, it’s the writing. David Chase, the renowned producer of the series, is able to mix vivid dialogue, realistic scenarios, and complex characters together to create one heck of a show. But it isn’t all the writing — the acting is also amazing. James Gandolfini, who plays the infamous Tony Soprano, is able to go incredibly deep into the mind of a part-psychopath mobster and part-family man. Edie Falco (Carmela Soprano), Michael Imerioli (Christopher Moltisanti), Lorraine Bracco (Dr. Jennifer Melfi), and more form a very well-rounded out and phenomenal cast, bringing the show to life with vivid realism.

But, despite how amazing the show is, the thing that most Sopranos fans have been talking about for the past week is not the quality of the series but “who’s gonna get whacked?” With a variety of theories floating around, from Tony killing Carmela to Phil killing Tony to Paulie killing everyone, the possibilities are endless. But, because this is my blog and I make the editorial decisions around here, here’s my personal theory on how the show will end (note, non-Sopranos fans may not understand half of what I say here):

Paulie’s going to try to whack Tony. He’s the only big guy left, and he’s always had a nasty temper. In the mean time, AJ’s going to get wind of a plot to kill Tony by Phil Leotardo’s crew, and try to come to his dad’s rescue. While AJ makes his way over to Tony’s hiding place, Paulie’s got the boss cornered with a loaded pistol, and is not afraid to use it. Now, just as Paulie pulls the trigger, AJ jumps in and takes the bullet. With Paulie and Tony both in shock, Phil’s guys bust in and kill Paulie while Tony manages to make it out alive. Carmela soon gets wind of what happens, and in a final cry of frustration of her husband’s profession the death of her only son, divorces Tony and cuts off all ties with him, once and for all. Meadow also follows in her mother’s example, leaving Tony alone. At the same time, the FBI busts Phil’s operation, leaving Tony in the clear. But, with his family in ruins and his personal life destroyed, Tony has to live out his days in poverty and solitude — the classic Greek tragic ending.

Well, that’s my two cents. But for now, it’s only speculation and mourning. So, goodbye my beloved Sopranos, too bad I only knew ya for 14 months. But hey, the magic of Netflix is that I can see all previous five seasons, plus start watching HBO’s other critically acclaimed show, The Wire. But, in the immortal words of Carmela Soprano, “Everything must come to an end.”

40th Anniversary of the Six Day War

Soldiers Western Wall 1967Today marks the 40th anniversary of the Six Day War (during which Israel captured the West Bank with East Jerusalem, the Sinai peninsula with the Gaza Strip, and the Golan Heights) on the Gregorian calendar (the day is celebrated in Israel as Yom Yerushalayim on the Hebrew calendar date of Iyar 28, which occurred a few weeks ago). Unfortunately, I did not have enough time to write a full post about the anniversary, but I did find a great op-ed in The Times that summed up my opinion on the war and its aftermath. The general gist of the piece, by Israeli Tom Segev, is as follows:

But peace with the Palestinians has not come one inch closer. As a result more and more Israelis realize today that Israel gained absolutely nothing from the conquest of the Palestinian territories. Speculating again in hindsight — Israel may have been better off giving up the West Bank and East Jerusalem without peace than signing the 1994 peace agreement with Jordan while keeping these territories. Forty years of oppression and Palestinian terrorism, both extremely cruel, have undermined Israel’s Jewish and democratic foundations. With about 400,000 Israelis living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank and with extreme Islamism as a driving force among the Palestinians, the conflict has become infinitely more difficult to solve.

This is pretty much the same as my views, which is that the settler movement, the movement of right-wing Israelis to Palestinian territories, is the cause of most of Israel’s problems and its negative image with the liberal populous and world in general.

Obviously, I have a tremendous amount of affinity for and pride in Israel. But, unfortunately, most of the world doesn’t feel that way. The settler movement has caused Israelis to become deeply trenched in the Palestinian territories, resulting in the peace process become infinitely harder and more complicated. Plus, this difficulty in achieving peace has caused Israel to become regarded by most of the world as “having a negative influence in the world” at best, and “should be wiped off the map” at worst. What conservative Israelis, and even their global opponents, forget is that Israeli was founded on the principle of compromise. The partition of Palestine gave Israel very little territory, yet David Ben-Gurion still accepted it. So, while Israel may have made some dumb decisions in its past, that doesn’t mean that it has no right to exist.

Larry Wilmore, a.k.a. The Daily Show’s “Senior Black Correspondent” on Fresh Air

Wilmore200On today’s edition of NPR’s Fresh Air (which also publishes a podcast on iTunes), Larry Wilmore, who is The Daily Show’s “Senior Black Correspondent,” in addition to creating The Bernie Mac Show, writing for The Fresh Prince of Bel Air, and guest producing on The Office (and appearing in one episode as a “diversity coach”) is interviewed by Terry Gross. It’s a really interesting interview with discussions on blacks in television and other topics, in addition to hearing something serious from a really funny Daily Show correspondent.

Steve Jobs: “Like giving ice water to someone in hell

Steve Jobs, you bloody genius.