Author Archive for Aaron

Thoughts on Last Night’s Debate

Well, as you politically aware readers know, last night was the last debate of the 2008 Presidential campaign, between John “Maverick/Oldie/Satan” McCain and Barack “Terrorist/Hussein/Savior” Obama. Now, the day after, the question to be asked is, who won? Let’s see what the Interwebs had to say:

The Huffington Post

John McCain didn’t just fail to get the game-changer he needed — he was trounced in this third and final debate, if the instant post-debate polling provides any indication.

The New York Times

Senator John McCain used the final debate of the presidential election on Wednesday night to raise persistent and pointed questions about Senator Barack Obama’s character, judgment and policy prescriptions in a session that was by far the most spirited and combative of their encounters this fall.

CNN

John McCain came out of the gate strong, but Barack Obama gained strength as the night progressed Wednesday in the final presidential debate where each candidate tried to convince voters that he is better equipped to steer the nation through these troubled times.

From this little metablogging sampler of post-debate analysis, it seems that a) McCain’s glove pulling made the debate more interesting, and b) Obama still schooled his old man ass. In my personal opinion (based on the first hour I watched for before heading off to bed), McCain definitely gave his best performance yet, with zinger lines like “Senator Obama, I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago.” Still, Obama was cool and collected, if a little dry, considering that he has significant leads in the swing-state polls. There was also another interesting aspect of last night’s debate: Joe the Plumber. Who is Joe the Plumber? Well, he’s a combination of two things: a Joe Six-pack-like metaphor for the Everyman (and the hockey mom’s working-class spouse), and he’s also an Ohio plumber named Joe Wurzelbacher (seen with Senator Obama at right). Mr. Wurzelbacher’s now famed epithet was mentioned over two dozen times last night, mainly in reference to the differences between the two candidates’ tax policies, prompting some lively Internet discussion.

But the question still remains — did this debate help determine who the next President will be? Maybe not, but I’m sure that it helped the business of one Ohio plumber.

I’m back…at least for now

Hello my friends in the blogosphere, assuming there are any of you left. I’m just checking in after a, whoa, ten month hiatus. Yes, I know, far too long. Most of you have probably moved on to a blog with more, shall we say, blogging? But, have no fear, I’m coming back to do some more frequent, informal ramblings, in addition to the occasional longer, more formal editorial. So, here’s what’s new in my life since we last talked (actually, since I last sent typed text to a vast void of uncertainty called the Internet):

  • I’ve finished 10th grade (woohoo!)
  • I’ve started 11th grade (boohoo!)
  • In between I had a fun summer made up of a program Georgetown University, vacationing in Greece and Boston (with a brief stint in Martha’s Vineyard), and, of course, chilling in my hometown, NYC (which really means sitting on my ass and playing Halo 3 all day)
  • Seeing a ton of movies (including The Dark Knight, Burn After Reading, and Rachel Getting Married)
  • Watching tons of TV shows (including old-favs like Heroes and The office, but also newbies for me like Weeds, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, and Dexter)
  • Obsessively following the election, whether at HuffPo, The Daily Show, or SNL (Tina Fey, I LOVE YOU!)
  • Updating my tumblelog, Freedmania!, which you all should read in between these blog posts for a taste of how what I think is important on the web (hint: if it involves videos of overweight cats, I probably like it)
  • Watching as Wall Street falls apart around me while Mr. Hank Paulson desperately tries to Scotch-tape is back together
  • Waiting to get the new MacBook Pro tomorrow after my old one broke
      So yeah, that’s about all I have to say for now. So, my dear, dear readers who are still with me after all of my lack of blogging commitment, remember that this is No Ordinary Times, and that in extraordinary times come extraordinary blog posts from very un-extraordinary people, in addition to a $700 billion bailout plan. Oh, and stay classy.

      Cheers,
      Aaron

      P.S. Chag sameach to my Jewish brethren who will be enjoying tonight’s meal in a disheveled hut of sorts (read: sukkah).

I’m published in The New York Times!

With Christmas and everything, I just never got around to posting that on Monday I was published in The New York Times. I wrote an entry for the Metropolitan Diary column, which you can see on page B2 of Monday’s paper (mine’s the fourth entry in the piece), or online. Plus, the cartoon accompanying the column is for my entry, which is great. Here’s an except, hope you enjoy:

On a late September afternoon, a neighbor of mine, Noah Ingber, came home to his Morningside Heights apartment from his teaching job in Queens, and noticed that the back wheel of his bike, locked outside his building, was gone.

A cry for Christmas cheer

There has been a long running stereotype that New Yorkers are heartless cynics. While this is, for the most part, untrue, it has recently turned out to be so, to some extent, for a specific matter — Christmas. We all know what Christmas here in the United States is like — holiday-themed songs played indefinitely, a sea of red, white, and green in stores and public areas, and of course the infamous rush of holiday shopping. This is especially true in New York, where “Christmas cheer” has become an overpowering, ever-present force in December. As such, many New Yorkers, and others throughout the country, are joining the “anti-Christmas” front in, if not anger or hatred, but just sheer annoyance, of the presence of Christmas in every nook and cranny of their life. But what is the “anti-Christmas” front. Here’s a breakdown:

The religious Protestants: These are people who want to move back to how Christmas used to be in America before the 20th Century. Little to the knowledge of the average Christmas celebrator, Christmas was not just discouraged by the early settlers in Massachusetts Bay Colony, it was hated by them. The Puritans, who saw Christmas as a religiously inaccurate (Christian and historical authroities both suggest that Jesus was born sometime in the spring) and overly pagan (the holiday was really a winter solstice holiday that incorporated Christian ideas into the Yule of Northern Europe and the Saturnalia of Rome, along with others) kept Christmas from really being celebrated in America until the late 19th and early-2th century. Lately, though, many ministers, churches, and individuals have been starting to reject Chritmas celebrations again (Beliefnet has an interesting article on the subject)

The anti-”consumerization”-of-Christmas crowd: This group is mainly made up of the disciples of Bill O’Reilly (”The War on Christmas”) and Reverend Billy/Billy Talen (What Would Jesus Buy?), who believe that Christmas has become overly-comemrcialized and needs to be be tuned down and revert back to its old ideas of family, community, giving, and the birth of Jesus.

The very religious non-Christians: Mainly very observant members of other religions, such as Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and others, are against the proliferation of Christmas in secular America, and wish for it to be restrained, in all forms, in the public sphere.

The atheists: While many “new atheists,” such as Richard Dawkins, do celebrate the secular parts of Christmas, they despise the religious parts, in contrast to those who are against the “consumerization” of Christmas.

The “annoyed” crowd: The recently emerging group of people who are ordinary, secular Americans who simply hate hearing Christmas songs at every Starbucks and seeing holiday decorations in every public space.

So, where do I fall? As a an observant Jew by American, and even New Yorker, standards, I don’t celebrate Christmas at all. No tree, no stockings, no festive, home-cooked meal on Christmas Eve and Day (though I do like to do a little more than eat Chinese food), and no childhood-belief in Santa Claus. Still, I sort of enjoy the Christmas atmosphere that exists in the United States, and especially New York City. Sure, the music gets a little annoying after a while, but I love seeing all the festive decorations, hearing some classic holiday songs, and walking through the city on a crisp, hopefully snowy, December day. But that isn’t even really about Christmas. Instead, it seems to be more about a general winter solstice celebration, the same kind that has existed throughout human society for thousand of years. Back then, people had solstice holidays so they could have some warmth and light in the cold, short days during this time of year. While we now have these basic needs on a 24/7 basis, holidays like Christmas are able to provide us with something else — a warm, hopeful spirit of giving, family, and celebration that can help us get through the darkest part of the year.

With that in mind, I wish you all a late Hanukkah Sameach (”Happy Hanukkah” in Hebrew), Happy Kwanzaa, Happy Yule, Io Saturnalia (”Happy Saturnalia” in Latin), and Merry Christmas on this winter solstice night.

Palestinian-Israeli-American peace talks redux

As many of you already know, today was the Middle East Peace conference in Annapolis, Maryland, hosted by President Bush. While many other Middle Eastern dignitaries showed up, the main attractions were Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who were there to, at least in theory, try to discuss peace between their waring peoples. If anything, the greatest accomplishment for Bush from the event was the following photograph (which is most graciously stolen from The New York Times).
27Prexy2-600
Nice, isn’t it? But doesn’t it remind you of another, similar photograph from, say, 1993?
Rabin, Clinton, Arafat
Yeah, that picture depicts then-Isralei Prime minister Yitzchak Rabin, PLO leader Yassir Arafat, and President Clinton at the signing of the Oslo Accords. Now, let’s see what they’re up to now:
Rabin, Clinton, Arafat-1
Yeah, not so good. And as for the Oslo Accords, they kind of, well, failed. The Israeli and Palestinian death toll from suicide bombings and attacks over the past fourteen years should tell you that. But that was then, what about now? Here’s how our current peace-makers are doing in the polls:
27Prexy2-600-1
OK fine, “Hamas wants to kill me” isn’t a percentage, but I couldn’t find any Abbas poll statistics in a quick Google search. And as for Olmert’s numbers, they’re the same as the margin of error, or lower! Theoretically, less than zero people in Israel support Olmert! That’s not even possible!!! But the point is that all of these guys need something good on their record if they want to go down in history as anything better than “total screw-up.”

Sure, maybe I’m taking a cynical view on the conference, which I am. But truthfully, Israel-Palestine talks haven’t worked well in the past. Rabin was assasinated for even participating in them! But I still believe that peace is possible, just not in Annapolis with a President who needs something to distract the public from Iraq. But on the plus side, Abbas and Olmert have both vowed to come up with a peace treaty by the end of the year. For their sake, and ours too, hopefully they will.

“A date which will live in infamy”

911 World Trade CenterOn the morning of December 7th, 1941, an air strike from the Empire of Japan attacked the U.S. military base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. A day later, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan, thus entering the U.S. into World War II. In the almost 66 years that have gone by since this event, many, especially of my generation, have lost the emotion attached to it. But this has been replaced by an even greater modern catastrophe — the September 11th attacks.
Now, the reason I evoke the attack on Pearl Harbor on this sixth anniversary on 9/11 is because of how much Pearl Harbor changed the world today. Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into World War II on the side of Allies, which if we had not done, the Axis would have probably won the war, thus changing the course of world history forever. But could 9/11 have had this same effect?

Right now it’s too soon to tell. But just six years later, so much has already changed. When millions of ordinary Americans went to bed on September 11th, 2001, not one of them could possibly have imagined how different life would be like today. The 90’s in the United States, and much of the world, was a heyday. Not since the 1920’s had the U.S. had both economic prosperity and diplomatic peace on such a scale (and not to mention being loved by, or at least popular with, much of the world). Alas, it was not to be for long. First, with the dotcom bust of 2000, and then with 9/11 a whole generation of baby boomers entered a new era defined by an unpopular war, an unpopular president, and the always looming threat of terror in an unbalanced and disrupted world. And adults aren’t the only ones affected. My generation, also known as Generation Z (or what I like to call “the iGeneration” — those born in the early and mid-1990’s) is following a similar pattern to those born in the early-to-mid-1920’s — prosperity during the single-digit years, a catastrophe, and the difficult aftermath during the teenage and young adult years.

Still, as I said before, we’re only just beginning to get some perspective on the events of 9/11. We still don’t know how the war in Iraq and the overall war on terror will proceed. We still don’t know how much of the current geo-political make-up was caused by 9/11. But, what is for sure,is that life will never exactly be the same after the “date which will live in infamy.”

* * *

While the main part of my post is now finished, I just wanted to make one final note. Today is not just to commemorate those who died (for a complete list, see here), but also for those who have survived. Here in New York City is probably the place where people are the most affected by the tragic events of 9/11, especially since many people know first-hand someone who died because of the attacks. Yet many people who were at the World Trade Center that day and in the days after got sick from rescue work, yet still don’t recieve government-susidized heathcare. To help, try writing to your local copngressman about the problem (sorry I don’t have a link for a website on the matter).

But even though this September 11th (a Tuesday, just like in 2001) was a dark and gloomy day here in New York, the sun setting leaves a nice, cool blue of solemmn, calm rememberence on the whole city skyline.

I’m going to be on NPR tomorrow

logo_npr_125.gifOf my many journalistic dreams, one is dong a star segment on NPR. Well, tomorrow, I come closer to that dream. Sure, I’m not doing a star segment, heck I’m not even reporting, but I am being interviewed. Yes, tomorrow morning on National Public Radio’s Morning Edition, I will be interviewed by reporter Corey Moore about the confusing world of high-definition video. Actually, the interview itself already happened on Tuesday, but it will air (with much of the original 15-minute recording cut-out) tomorrow morning. Unfortunately, I do not have an exact time of when my interview will come on, though it should be in the second half of the show. So, for those of you in my neck of the woods, you can catch the interview on WNYC 93.9 FM between 6 and 7 AM and 8 and 9 AM, or on any other NPR member station from around the country. The interview will also be posted online at npr.org sometime Monday morning, so check back here tomorrow for a link.

UPDATE: The segment aired this morning, and is also available for listening to in Real Player and Windows Media formats online. It’s about 3.5 minutes long, and I only talk for about 30-seconds of it, but it’s still pretty awesome. Also, I’d just like to say hi to all you visitors who came here via the link on NPR’s site.

UPDATE 2
: Google Analytics reports that on Monday this site got 122 visits, compared to the usual 5-15. Woohoo!

Daily Digest

feedlist("http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=8Hkve7gO3BGwUpEeX0sBXw&_render=rss")
?>

Read More…

Props to the Pops: “On Education” column on digg!

Somehow, my dad, who is, in every possible way, “technologically inept,” managed to get on the front page of super-modern-Web-2.0 social news site digg (His story, from his most recent education column about a teacher who was forced to pass a failing student, has 2041 diggs and counting). Yet somehow, me, with all of the tech blogging and podcasting I do, never once got any of my work on digg. So why is is that my father did. Could it be his 30+ years of journalistic experience, the recognition of his publisher, or just the fact that he’s an amazing writer? Nah, I don’t think so.

But seriously, the column was very well written, in addition to the fact that I actually read it (I admittedly do not read most of my father’s many columns). So, you guys should definitely check out the column, and digg it up! Now, if only it could get on Diggnation

Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah… Part II

200px-triumph_poster.jpgYou may remember my last post with this title, taken from Kaddish,the Jewish prayer for the dead. It was for when The New York Giants lost their first playoffs game of the season, hence cutting them short of another chance at the Super Bowl.

Well today marks another, even more sad occasion — Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. has bought Dow Jones, including The Wall Street Journal. Yes, at some point early this morning or last night, following months of deals, talks and deliberation, News Corp. and Dow Jones signed the deal for the sale of one of the oldest and most prestigious news organizations in the world. Now, as I already went over what this deal means for the future of Dow Jones and the newspaper industry in general in an older post which came out when Murdoch first proposed the sale, I will simply restate my central point:

News Corp. offers the [newspaper] industry exactly what it wants — money, popularity, and regained dominance. Of course, News Corp. would do to the entire newspaper industry what it did to The Times of London, The News York Post, and countless others — turn it into a platform for Murdoch’s (and, as it’s assumed, his successor’s) conservative political ideas and resorting the journalistic quality to that of the cheapest tabloids.

In a nutshell, this means that Murdoch knows how to make a 19th century business profitable in the 21th century, albeit at the price of all and any journalistic integrity. Even more simply, he can “save the newspaper industry by taking its soul.” Yeah, you get the point.

So, the paperwork has been signed. The Bancroft family, after much fighting, debating, and dealing, finally agreed to the deal, ending their 100 years of ownership of Dow Jones. Of course, as many journalist, analysts, and others, including, deep down, myself, believed, the sale of Dow Jones to News Corp. was a done deal the day CNBC broke the story.

So, while News Corp. will engulf Dow Jones and The Wall Street Journal, breaking down its esteemed journalism into little, bite-sized articles of trash, the story of Dow Jones’s final days will not entirely be a sad one. The Bancroft family, despite eventually giving in to Murdoch’s requests, fought very nobly for the integrity of their publication, and I still hold a great deal of respect for those who kept on fighting until the end, including Christopher Bancroft and Jane Cox MacElree. Speaking of fighting until the end, Leslie Hill has now become, in my mind, one of the most noble business people I know. Not only does Ms. Hill refuse to be in the same room as Murdoch, she also resigned from the Dow Jones board right after the sale was finalized. You go girl!

But, no matter how well they fought, Dow Jones has in fact loss. So now, let us say a virtual prayer for what such a great, bold, and strong news company: Yeetgadal v’ yeetkadash sh’mey rabbah…